Security review and audit status

Status: Not decided

The recorded security review was internal, and independent audits have not started.

Status: Not decidedIndependent audits have not started. The existing review was internal.

Stage One's status report records confirmed findings and code fixes from its own hard review. It also records local module, fuzz, invariant and parity work. These are reports from that build, not fresh test results from this documentation run and not an independent auditor's opinion.

What the documentation verified

The docs harness checks source quotations, computed fixtures, status data, language, metadata, links and publication holds. Its production build checks internal links. These checks help keep the explanation attached to code. They do not examine every possible protocol execution.

The source baseline has no recorded devnet or testnet deployment. Local tests therefore do not establish deployed bytecode, configured authorities, operational key custody or a network-wide incident response process.

What remains unpublished

Q-004 limits public finding details to a summary until Kunal approves disclosure. The detailed finding records and open implementation differences remain review material. Audit firms, scope and arrangements have not been selected in the available decision record (Q-118).

An independent review would need a defined code revision and scope. A changed implementation needs its own review decision; a report about an earlier revision is not a transferable approval.

See known limitations for development-only components and public open questions for the pending decisions.